Not to me he has not. This is a reply I have just written to an earlier comment that I had not responded to “Light is an interesting phenomena. We can see it, yet it in not on planes 49:5-7. However, we don’t have etheric vision, so if it is on a higher etheric plane, how come we are seeing it?

Plasma is on plane 49:4 as it is just a disassociated atom and that is plasma! How this is beamed through inter-galactic space is mind boggling. If what Thunderbolt.org says is correct, then whole star systems form on these massive “Birkland” currents. If we fit this into a concept of the seven rays that start from Plane-1, it does make sense.

These plasma currents are the lowest form of energy that must be flowing out from these massive monadic centres. Imagine what must be flowing on the higher planes of matter!”

Hi Lyn

I happened to come across your comment and see the I have not replied.

Light is an interesting phenomena. We can see it, yet it in not on planes 49:5-7. However, we don’t have etheric vision, so if it is on a higher etheric plane, how come we are seeing it?

Plasma is on plane 49:4 as it is just a disassociated atom and that is plasma! How this is beamed through inter-galactic space is mind boggling. If what Thunderbolt.org says is correct, then whole star systems form on these massive “Birkland” currents. If we fit this into a concept of the seven rays that start from Plane-1, it does make sense.

These plasma currents are the lowest form of energy that must be flowing out from these massive monadic centres. Imagine what must be flowing on the higher planes of matter!

Has Lars replied anything on this question?

In the comment above, the person pointed out that science has discovered plasma filaments connecting the Galaxies. But these plasma filaments are also made of ethereal matter of the 49th plane. This is interesting..

I’ve been watching all of your videos from the beginning of the series to here. What a wonderful piece of work! The scope of esoteric wisdom is amazing and pedagogy brilliant. I think I even detected some humor in the presentation. I look forward to continuing my exploration of your series. Thanks so much for this gift of knowledge.

In regard to the question about the transmission of light through intergalactic space, plasma filaments have been detected connecting galaxies at vast distances. If scientific equipment is able to detect electrified plasma in intergalactic space (mostly by satellite far from earth) it seems that a sea of etheric substance must pervade the entire physical universe. Indeed, it has been calculated that 99.999% of the universe is electrified plasma. Plasma is probably one of the lowest (densest) subplanes of etheric substance. DK says that light is transmitted via the second etheric subplane – which is probably more refined than what astrophysicists are detecting in intergalactic space.

Lucis trust has a very interesting collection of articles on the “Electric Bridge” which deals with the overlap of esoteric wisdom and the theories of the “electric universe”. Thunderbolts.info also has a wealth of information, but it is decidedly more challenging scientifically.

You ask a very good question Alexey and one that I have pondered on long and hard. I must make the effort to write to Lars Adelskogh and ask him the same question.

In the mean time, let’s try and work out an answer from first principles. You are absolutely correct, if intergalactic space is only filled with primary atoms, how can light, which are particles existing on the 49th Plane of Matter, somehow get transmitted across this empty space? I think it is safe to assume there is something very special about light. It exists on all planes of matter, yet it is different on each plane. If we assume that all particles are made from an aggregate of 1-atoms, maybe there is an essence of an event that can carry across, what is the 1st Plane of Matter, to later materialise back on the plane from which it originated. Anyway, that is a first stab. Let’s see what Lars says.

OK Roberto

When I get round to finally sending out the invitations, we should start as early as the following week, 6th October. I will try and record the discussions and I will send you an MP3 recording.

Bye
Roberto

Hi Rob

I lose track of what is in my current posts as I am already editing post 32! In one of my previous posts, maybe this one, I talked about the fictitious life of Jesus and the fact that we know nothing about the real life of the Bodhisattva, who overshadowed the persona of Jeshu, someone who lived 150 years earlier. This was not a direct reference to the Gnostic movement. It was however relevant that they were the instigator of the writings that eventually became the gospels as we know them today.

What I am continually doing is referring to Gnostic symbology when I talk about the Trinity. I also quote often from the Gospels and they are all Gnostic anyway. I have no intention to go into the politics and philosophies of any sect in my presentations. That becomes a history lesson and does not increase the World View of the viewer to any great extent.

When I do dip into history and that is most likely to be in my third set of presentations, I will talk about Schemes, Chains, Rounds and Globes. That will be a history lesson and a half but that is years away. I have a lot more to say in this series of presentations before I tackle our envelopes of incarnation in much greater detail.

In the mean time some friends have asked me to form a study group and the first topic we will look at is the ‘Explanation’ by Lars Adelskogh. This is a good introduction to Hylozoics. The study group will convene at 12 noon on Tuesdays EST for up to 2 hours. If you are interested in joining, let me know.