<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 39. BEYOND THE HUMAN KINGDOM	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://adventuresofthemonad.com/39-beyond-the-human-kingdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/39-beyond-the-human-kingdom/</link>
	<description>Where did we come from? Why are we here? Where are we going?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 01:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/39-beyond-the-human-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 01:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=2944#comment-242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://adventuresofthemonad.com/39-beyond-the-human-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-241&quot;&gt;Richard Burr&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Richard 

The numbering system you refer to is totally arbitrary and bears no linkage to where a monad is focused within its envelope structure. The first time I came across this scoring system was in the works of David Hawkins. Bladon also used it in his book and I think it was borrowed from Hawkins. Hylozoics system of looking at consciousness is based in the reality of the atomic and molecular structure of our envelopes, not an arbitrary scale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://adventuresofthemonad.com/39-beyond-the-human-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-241">Richard Burr</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Richard </p>
<p>The numbering system you refer to is totally arbitrary and bears no linkage to where a monad is focused within its envelope structure. The first time I came across this scoring system was in the works of David Hawkins. Bladon also used it in his book and I think it was borrowed from Hawkins. Hylozoics system of looking at consciousness is based in the reality of the atomic and molecular structure of our envelopes, not an arbitrary scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Burr		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/39-beyond-the-human-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Burr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=2944#comment-241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Kazim.   The charts  frequently use a numerical nomenclature (400, 500, 600, etc).  for what I believe represent levels of consciousness.  Can you please elaborate a bit on the what this numbering system represents and how it is the same or different to other measures of consciousness such as where the monad is focusing attention / initiation levels, etc.   thanks!  Rich]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kazim.   The charts  frequently use a numerical nomenclature (400, 500, 600, etc).  for what I believe represent levels of consciousness.  Can you please elaborate a bit on the what this numbering system represents and how it is the same or different to other measures of consciousness such as where the monad is focusing attention / initiation levels, etc.   thanks!  Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
