Hi Frank

Sorry for misnaming you. One of the many signs of early onset dementia!

Thank you for these two recommendations. I have been able to find the first on an on-line library and got the second from Kindle. I will read them avidly.

All the best

K

Frank here, not sure who Martin is. You’ve hit the nail on the head when you said that reality is a thought (or dream?) projected from the absolute/metverse. I can recommend the following books that may give you an insight for future presentations.

Stalking the wild pendulam by Itzhak Bentov
Anything by Bernard Kastrup but in particular – Dreamed up reality, More than Allegory , Why Materialism is baloney

Dear Martin

You are correct about most people not being prepared to expand their consciousness. This does not really matter. As Laurency says, if you are happy to go long with the jog-trot of Humanity, it will take you approximately 182,000 incarnations to move through the 4th Kingdom. If you want to speed things up and help the rest of Humanity to get there faster, then you have to make an effort.

The interesting thing about Hylozoics is that it makes no sense to people who have not been exposed to it in some way before. This is the gospel according to Laurency. I am rather hoping that you have to start somewhere, so if you are prepared to study what is being said, it may begin to make sense to you for the first time. Maybe this is wishful thinking on my part.

What Laurency tells us is that if we see knowledge, what is it for? Is it a selfish act? I can make the excuse that I seek it to help others find it as well. But what if you are the type who just likes to acquire knowledge, for knowledge’s sake, and then just gloat over it? Clearly, you are not going to impress your guardian angel that way.

The solution is to live a life of service and forget about yourself. In this way the Law of Divine Grace will apply and knowledge will be given to you. I am not suggesting you take up residence in a leper colony.

The reality is that we usually do a combination of both. We seek knowledge and then share it, while serving others in whatever capacity we interact with the world.

I have meditated for a few years now and all it involves is me sitting cross-legged and chanting a few mantras for 40 minutes. I am hopelessly lazy in actually trying to quietening my mind. What I have found much more productive is to contemplate something, rather than trying to meditate. What this has resulted in is that answers to my pondering just drop into my head.

What I have done, from the start of this year, is tune up my body. I have taken my BMI from 23.6 to 19.1. I have also gone vegan. I practice intermittent fasting. My logic is that as I am 60 now, I need to really control how I feed my body if I want the war chariot to carry me into battle for the next 20 years or so. Going vegan was just a logical outcome from this.

So starting from the base, I am purifying the vessel. Now the challenge is going to be filling the vessel with something meaningful and then sharing its contents with other.

An excellent response! So, what you are saying is that it is impossible for science to provide evidence for hylozoics. This is unfortunate, as most people will not take things on face value and are not prepared to make the effort to expand their consciousness.

I have been meditating for several years but unfortunately have not come any closer to discovering any evidence of proof of hylozics, maybe I’m just not destined to meet my guardian angel or have my doubts belayed. I suppose I’m trying to justify my interest in hylozics but cannot shake the feeling that it is futile gesture. Any tips? Have you had any personal experience that you could share that confirms your beliefs?

Hi Martin

Laurency clearly states that all theories are hypotheses and can only be tested by you expanding your consciousness to a point where you can objectively ascertain what reality is. Now here is the rub. How can science provide proof of anything outside plane-49? It can’t. So you are left with no alternative to find other methods of investigation to go further.

Laurency does state that in not too short a time, science will begin to realise the existence of the etheric spheres of existence. What is more, we have within our own capacity, the ability to view the etheric planes with our physical eyes. We do not need to activate our Navel chakra.

Rigorous debate is going to get us no where, because our philosophical machinations can never know the truth. We are given all we know. We can not come to any startling conclusions ourselves, beyond what is already presented to us, by those monads on the 46th plane that dream up all we know. We can, however, reflect on what we have been given and try to order it is such a way that we provide tenable explanations as to the what we see around us and even things we can not see. I think I will present these views in a presentation in due course.

Now to the concept of the monad being a negative bubble in the metaverse. I feel another presentation coming up even as I think about this! LOL Ok, here is my take on it. You are right, the monad comes from the Anti-Verse and as the word says, it is a monad, which in the Anti-Verse is called a Primordial Atom. This by the way is the theme I discuss in a presentation that airs on the 16th of this month. When it comes into the Universe, it is a space in the fabric of the Anti-Verse but that does not make it non-material. However, the whole universe is just a thought projection from the mind of the Absolute. So, yes, we are a figment of that omniscient imagination but our reality exists in the Anti-Verse, so there is matter involved somewhere. What the process of creation achieves, is that it allows space for the monad to be worked upon by a range of higher monads, until it wakes up and begins to discover its own God-potential.

My next script was going to be on the Absolute. You have given me the theme of how I will present this information. Thank you!

Science, unfortunately, is no more correct than any theological prognostication. There is no such thing as a scientific fact. There are only hypotheses that stand for about 15 years. Hypotheses that stand longer have become dogmas and how does that further our knowledge of the world around us?

So to conclude, we do have to rely on what information is given to us. There is absolutely nothing out there that we have come up with ourselves. We think that this genius or that came up with this or that theorem, but all these ideas were causal. All they did was bring those ideas into a mental configuration. The ideas did not even originate on the causal plane, they came from the Unity Plane (46).

What is the solution to this problem? Expand your consciousness through mediation and then be prepared to be amazed at what you discover. If you are waiting for science to come up with the answers you desire, you may be waiting a very long time. In fact, expanding your consciousness is going to take a long time, but at least you are in charge of the process from your end. Your guardian angel is prepared to meet you half way but you have to start the journey by yourself.

Hi Kazim

I agree, it is difficult to relate the complexities of quantum theory to hylozoics and as you say, even if this could be done, with our current understanding, it would only be relevant to the physical realm.

That leads me crux of the matter, all the hylozoic theories are just that, theories. There is no proof that any of it is true (much like string theory). Intuitively, some of them resonate for me but to be honest, it is difficult to except most as true.

I strongly suspect, as Laurency states, that the hylozoic principles are the basis of a much deeper understanding of reality. In Bladon’s book, the monad is described as a negative bubble in the metaverse. This seems to be a more precise definition of a monad than perceiving it as physical matter but this far from a satisfactory explanation of the true nature of the monad. How does this concept of an “atom” become an omniscient being?

Most of religions are on the decline in the western world due to outdated and often nonsensical concepts. Science and materialism have sidelined religion for many people – in the UK only 5% of the population attend a Christian institution.

From a personal level, and maybe to make hylozoics more relatable, I think some sort of proof or modification is required. This maybe provided by new scientific theories and methods, rigorous philosophical debate or even a new “Laurency”. Until this is the case, relying on the words of so called ascended masters is no better than having faith in medieval religious ideas.

I hope you do not think I am belittling your presentations, which I enjoyed immensely but blind faith is not enough for me to accept hylozoics as truth.

Hi Frank

I hear what you area saying and Bladon did write a chapter where he compared current scientific theories with world views propounded by various religions.

The first issue that comes to hand in the case of quantum mechanics is that even the inventors of it say they don’t really understand it. Based on this fact, what chance do I have for presenting a coherent argument for any concept?

The second issue is even if you go into the realms of sub-atomic particles, you are still within the Cosmic Physical Plane. What about the other six cosmic planes? If you look at our knowledge, afforded to us by the Hierarchy, practically everything we know about anything, falls within the remit of the Cosmic Physical Kingdom. Into which kingdom do you think the machinations of quantum mechanics fall? I have not got a clue.

I feel you are on safe ground if you draw analogies on concepts like the Big Bang Theory, with the coming into existence of a universe sponsored by an Absolute. But to make it from String Theory to a Hylozoic principle would be very challenging for me to do.

We have to be honest with ourselves and admit that Hylozoics is not for emotionally centred people. It is also more challenging for people who are resonating on Rays 2, 4 and 6. Hylozoics is really for Ray 5 people. This is obviously not an absolute statement but I hope you get where I am coming from.

I think it is easier to relate Gnostic principles to conventional religions, if you wish to reach out to people who are beginning to question their current World view. What has surprised me is the reluctance for students of esoterics, schooled in the Bailey books, to even try and contemplate on the constructs put forward by Laurency. What makes Hylozoics unique is its focus on the matter principle being co-equal to consciousness and energy. Most students of esoterics just can’t accept this.

If you have any direct examples of where you think quantum mechanics and Hylozoics can be linked, please share them with me and I will contemplate further.

I just wanted to thank you for a thought provoking and well presented series, it must have taken alot of your time. Having watched all the videos and re-visiting Laurency’s and Lee Bladons books I’m wondering if the hylozoic view of the world needs a more modern interpretation. The newer ideas in quantum physics could be used to help in this. I only suggest this as most of these concepts must be taken on face value with no proof of fact, much like most religions. I am aware that Laurency advised against speculation but I think a new approach would make hylozoics more accessable to people. What are your thoughts on this? Anyway, thank you again, I’m looking forward to the further adventures of the monad.

Regards

Frank