<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 1. THE ADVENTURES OF THE MONAD	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/</link>
	<description>Where did we come from? Why are we here? Where are we going?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=1842#comment-203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-202&quot;&gt;Richard Burr&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Richard, I am glad that you are enjoying the sharing of the works of Laurency. Please do feel free to post comments or questions on the YouTube page or my website. An answer will alway be forthcoming. You can also contact me directly via the email link provided on the website. 

With regards to your question, about the electron in relation to the nucleus, there may well be merit in this analogy. However, I would ask you to consider that the electron itself is made from matter. So, we have matter orbiting matter. Where does consciousness come into the equation? Well, what we describe as consciousness is a magnetic field of sorts but when you register thoughts they are elemental particles in your Mental body. Again matter is involved. However, when you apparently move into the 3rd Triad, consciousness ceases to be of importance and motion/energy is the main game in town. I can not even begin to get my head round that concept.

It is still worth pondering on your model, because I feel within its restrictions, it does contain more than a grain of truth. More than that, it may tell us about the conscious status of atoms and what they might be perceiving. Remember, an atom is quaternary matter. It is located in the Mineral Kingdom, so it is beginning to perceive its environment in some way. This is the first stirrings of self-consciousness. It has to pass through three more kingdoms to wake up fully, but it is making a good start.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-202">Richard Burr</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Richard, I am glad that you are enjoying the sharing of the works of Laurency. Please do feel free to post comments or questions on the YouTube page or my website. An answer will alway be forthcoming. You can also contact me directly via the email link provided on the website. </p>
<p>With regards to your question, about the electron in relation to the nucleus, there may well be merit in this analogy. However, I would ask you to consider that the electron itself is made from matter. So, we have matter orbiting matter. Where does consciousness come into the equation? Well, what we describe as consciousness is a magnetic field of sorts but when you register thoughts they are elemental particles in your Mental body. Again matter is involved. However, when you apparently move into the 3rd Triad, consciousness ceases to be of importance and motion/energy is the main game in town. I can not even begin to get my head round that concept.</p>
<p>It is still worth pondering on your model, because I feel within its restrictions, it does contain more than a grain of truth. More than that, it may tell us about the conscious status of atoms and what they might be perceiving. Remember, an atom is quaternary matter. It is located in the Mineral Kingdom, so it is beginning to perceive its environment in some way. This is the first stirrings of self-consciousness. It has to pass through three more kingdoms to wake up fully, but it is making a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Burr		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Burr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 15:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=1842#comment-202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Kazim, thank you for starting this forum.  I have been studying Laurency’s writings for about 6 months and am glad to have found a group to share questions and how to best apply this knowledge in the modern world.   Your explanation of consciousness field as caused by motion of the matter made me think of the analogy of an an electro-magnetic field caused by the motion of an electron in the physical plane.  Do you think this is a reasonable association, or am I missing something?
Thank you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kazim, thank you for starting this forum.  I have been studying Laurency’s writings for about 6 months and am glad to have found a group to share questions and how to best apply this knowledge in the modern world.   Your explanation of consciousness field as caused by motion of the matter made me think of the analogy of an an electro-magnetic field caused by the motion of an electron in the physical plane.  Do you think this is a reasonable association, or am I missing something?<br />
Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=1842#comment-10</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-9&quot;&gt;Anita Thakore&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you, Anita. My second presentation is also published and I will hopefully publish a third this week that will recap on the salient points made in the first two.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-9">Anita Thakore</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you, Anita. My second presentation is also published and I will hopefully publish a third this week that will recap on the salient points made in the first two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anita Thakore		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anita Thakore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=1842#comment-9</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-7&quot;&gt;Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you Kazim for that very interesting presentation.  I look forward to more:)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-7">Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you Kazim for that very interesting presentation.  I look forward to more:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=1842#comment-8</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-5&quot;&gt;Roberto Zanotto&lt;/a&gt;.

Dark Energy and Dark Matter are mathematical constructs to try and salvage a failed model for how the universe manages to stay together. There is so little matter in the universe that it should not form galaxies. The reason it fails is because the model used relies on gravity, which is an incredibly weak force to hold anything together. The correct model for how the universe functions is called the Electric Universe. Look at the videos on thunderbolt.org.

From an esoteric point of view, the electric model works much better, as we know that electricity is an etheric force. It explains how the universe does not fall apart and you don&#039;t need any doggy constants to balance an equation. In Cosmic Fire, DK also talks about Electric Fire as being the highest of the three fires.

I feel it is just a coincidence that the gravitational model of the universe has proposed that there must be other forces that are present. However, these forces can’t be measured and there is no evidence for them!  Science at its best!  LOL

Hylozoics does indeed state that there are 49 planes of matter that all inter-penetrate one another. This does account for the apparent emptiness of interstellar space but will only be ‘proved’ when you refine your own instrument to investigate further.

‘Love’ is the consciousness aspect of the trinity, Matter, Motion, Consciousness. It can not exist on its own. To express itself, it must be bound to matter.  I feel a better word for ‘love’ is ‘unity’. This expresses a coming together of monads is a single expression of divine Love/Wisdom. The material focal point is the monad, the motion aspect is the Will to unite and the Consciousness aspect is the unity and wisdom this generates.

The term ‘implicit’ and ‘explicit’ I would transform to ‘objective’ and ‘subjective’.  This is how esoterics views consciousness. The cerebrospinal fluid is just a material conductor for etheric forces. The real processing, which is subjective, is occurring in the mental body. I will explain the three envelopes of incarnation more thoroughly in the 9th presentation. Nothing that is in the lowest planes of matter is capable of viewing anything other than objective matter on the three lowest sub-planes. The material connection between the physical, emotional and mental planes is called the Rainbow Bridge. It is made of subtle matter and grounds itself in the Ajna chakra. This is not to be confused with clairvoyant sight, which has its centre in the Solar Plexus chakra and is only capable of objective vision into the Emotional plane.

I hope that goes some way to answering your question. Please feel free to ask for further clarifications.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-5">Roberto Zanotto</a>.</p>
<p>Dark Energy and Dark Matter are mathematical constructs to try and salvage a failed model for how the universe manages to stay together. There is so little matter in the universe that it should not form galaxies. The reason it fails is because the model used relies on gravity, which is an incredibly weak force to hold anything together. The correct model for how the universe functions is called the Electric Universe. Look at the videos on thunderbolt.org.</p>
<p>From an esoteric point of view, the electric model works much better, as we know that electricity is an etheric force. It explains how the universe does not fall apart and you don&#8217;t need any doggy constants to balance an equation. In Cosmic Fire, DK also talks about Electric Fire as being the highest of the three fires.</p>
<p>I feel it is just a coincidence that the gravitational model of the universe has proposed that there must be other forces that are present. However, these forces can’t be measured and there is no evidence for them!  Science at its best!  LOL</p>
<p>Hylozoics does indeed state that there are 49 planes of matter that all inter-penetrate one another. This does account for the apparent emptiness of interstellar space but will only be ‘proved’ when you refine your own instrument to investigate further.</p>
<p>‘Love’ is the consciousness aspect of the trinity, Matter, Motion, Consciousness. It can not exist on its own. To express itself, it must be bound to matter.  I feel a better word for ‘love’ is ‘unity’. This expresses a coming together of monads is a single expression of divine Love/Wisdom. The material focal point is the monad, the motion aspect is the Will to unite and the Consciousness aspect is the unity and wisdom this generates.</p>
<p>The term ‘implicit’ and ‘explicit’ I would transform to ‘objective’ and ‘subjective’.  This is how esoterics views consciousness. The cerebrospinal fluid is just a material conductor for etheric forces. The real processing, which is subjective, is occurring in the mental body. I will explain the three envelopes of incarnation more thoroughly in the 9th presentation. Nothing that is in the lowest planes of matter is capable of viewing anything other than objective matter on the three lowest sub-planes. The material connection between the physical, emotional and mental planes is called the Rainbow Bridge. It is made of subtle matter and grounds itself in the Ajna chakra. This is not to be confused with clairvoyant sight, which has its centre in the Solar Plexus chakra and is only capable of objective vision into the Emotional plane.</p>
<p>I hope that goes some way to answering your question. Please feel free to ask for further clarifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazim Kemal-ur-Rahim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=1842#comment-7</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope this presentation inspires you to ask questions about Life, the Universe and Everything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this presentation inspires you to ask questions about Life, the Universe and Everything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roberto Zanotto		</title>
		<link>https://adventuresofthemonad.com/the-adventures-of-the-monad/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberto Zanotto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adventuresofthemonad.com/?p=1842#comment-5</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Kazim,
I would like to discuss the point about the emptiness of universe. I am referring to the issue about dark energy and dark matter raised by several scientists. In esoteric view, universe is permeated by different kinds of matter and energy, characterized by subtler density as consciousness level becomes higher. Furthermore, as per David Bohm’s theories, universe is divided in two domains: explicate order and implicate order, the latter starting below the Planck’s distance. My questions are: is it possible that dark energy and matter are the equivalent concepts of subtle matter considered in its esoteric meaning? Is it possible that love is one of the forms in which subtle matter expresses itself? Do you think that a very high frequency exchange process (via cerebrospinal fluid) between implicate and explicate order may be the vehicle of transferring man’s consciousness between physical reality and universe image perceived by man?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Kazim,<br />
I would like to discuss the point about the emptiness of universe. I am referring to the issue about dark energy and dark matter raised by several scientists. In esoteric view, universe is permeated by different kinds of matter and energy, characterized by subtler density as consciousness level becomes higher. Furthermore, as per David Bohm’s theories, universe is divided in two domains: explicate order and implicate order, the latter starting below the Planck’s distance. My questions are: is it possible that dark energy and matter are the equivalent concepts of subtle matter considered in its esoteric meaning? Is it possible that love is one of the forms in which subtle matter expresses itself? Do you think that a very high frequency exchange process (via cerebrospinal fluid) between implicate and explicate order may be the vehicle of transferring man’s consciousness between physical reality and universe image perceived by man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
